F
PhD Peer Reviewer – Quantum Information
Remote · Part Time
Be the first to apply
- Experience
- Any
- Salary
- —
- Openings
- 1
- Posted
- 3 hours ago
- Work mode
- Work from home
- Education
- PhD
- Eligibility
- Candidates with a PhD or equivalent advanced degree in the relevant subject area, plus at least 5 SCI/SSCI publications in the past 3 years, are eligible to apply. The role is suited to professionals who can work remotely on a part-time basis.
- Resume
- Required to apply
Job description
Role overview
This is a long-term, steady part-time opportunity that can be carried out remotely. Applicants should review the requirements carefully and complete the application form with accurate details.
Eligibility and profile
- You must hold a PhD or an equivalent advanced qualification in the relevant subject area.
- A minimum of 5 papers published in SCI or SSCI journals during the last 3 years is required.
- You should have a solid grasp of research methods and the ethical standards that apply to the discipline.
- Strong analytical judgment and critical reasoning are essential.
- You need excellent written communication skills to deliver clear, concise, and helpful feedback.
- Applicants must be able to work to deadlines and manage time efficiently.
- Discretion, neutrality, and confidentiality are expected throughout the review process.
- Previous experience reviewing for academic journals is strongly preferred.
- Comfort with online manuscript submission and peer-review platforms is important.
Key responsibilities
- Judge whether the submission introduces original ideas or meaningfully expands knowledge in the field.
- Review the research design and methodology for suitability, completeness, and clarity, with an eye on reproducibility.
- Check that the manuscript reflects current and relevant scholarship through an appropriate literature review.
- Assess whether the findings and conclusions are presented logically, backed by evidence, and meaningful to the discipline.
- Offer constructive, specific feedback that points out weaknesses, missing details, and any ethical issues.
- Make a recommendation on publication suitability, understanding that the final decision rests with the journal editor.
Additional notes
This engagement is intended to be stable and long term. It is part-time and remote, and the reviewer is expected to maintain objectivity and confidentiality at all times.